Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andie K. Daniell vs Amanda Rodgers Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Daniell vs Rodgers analysis and find out who is favored!
Andie K. Daniell vs Amanda Rodgers Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Daniell 2 - 1 Rodgers
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniell has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Rodgers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniell, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rodgers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Daniell has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rodgers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Daniell has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Rodgers winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Daniell has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 30/ 31). Rodgers has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 69/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Daniell winning 2 times and Rodgers being victorious 1 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Daniell winning 4 and Rodgers winning 3. The last match between Daniell and Rodgers was at the Macon, 21-10-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Andie K. Daniell getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Daniell and Rodgers have played a deciding set 1 times, with Daniell winning 1 times and Rodgers 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Daniell winning 0, and Rodgers 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniell has played against opponents with an average rank of while Rodgers has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniell has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rodgers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniell has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rodgers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
805
High
27
Age
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
491
High
31
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
54% (73-63)
Career Total W/L
49% (124-130)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Andie K. Daniell | Amanda Rodgers |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 34 | 31 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (85/136) | 67% (92/138) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 53% (45/85) | 55% (51/92) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (27/51) | 48% (22/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (8/22) | 32% (8/25) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (65/138) | 47% (64/136) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Andie K. Daniell
Player
Amanda Rodgers
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Amanda Rodgers
Player
Andie K. Daniell
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-4 4-6 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andie K. Daniell | Amanda Rodgers |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Andie K. Daniell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ingrid Neel
Player
Andie K. Daniell
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andie K. Daniell
Player
Rachel Gailis
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
16 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Layne Sleeth
Player
Andie K. Daniell
84%
(
63 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andie K. Daniell
Player
Maria Jose Portillo Ramirez
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Amanda Rodgers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Amanda Rodgers
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andie K. Daniell
Player
Amanda Rodgers
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Amanda Rodgers
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Chieh-Yu Hsu
Player
Amanda Rodgers
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Amanda Rodgers
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniell Vs Rodgers Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
